It's so heavily stylized that ages don't properly communicate there unless spelled out. the other shit in the article, is because if it's a character like Misty she might legitimately have no idea how old that character is. There is no coming back from that.Īnd the reason I keep harping on the Harry Potter stuff specifically and not. Posting child pornography, generally speaking, is up there with the absolute worst in terms of how reprehensible it is. Time and effort can repair those bridges. If someone is culturally insensitive or just has some outdated/harmful world views, that person needs to challenge those and grow as a person. Like there's a lot of mistakes you can make that are forgivable.
She literally looked up CP and then posted it publicly with no content warnings. As for the writer, the article makes me think the writing might be interesting in Goodbye Volcano High.Ĭlick to shrink.Okay I said "mistake" earlier because this wasn't some slip. The one effectively presenting the child porn is the editor. But that is the editor's fault for exposing me to them, not the writer. She did her job, though, she wrote a creative piece. Her article was an interesting viewpoint, and I appreciated her honesty in displaying her sexual adventures so publicly, but the pictures were a mistake. If there had been no editor, then she could be held responsible. She definitely made a mistake, but the editor was the one who failed her in publicly displaying that mistake. That's why editors exist, to reign in the creative process.
I mean there is a reason artists have a stereotype of being eccentric and weird. From a creative standpoint, the state of mind of a writer while in the midst of creating content and maintaining tone sometimes leads to pushing boundaries, that's just the risk of the creative process.
0 kommentar(er)
